Quote:
|
Originally Posted by acad54
Blackballed(Rhino) is that you?
|
Who else would be questioning why the agenda here (from the AMA District 14 website):
http://www.ama-d14.org/MI_07_Enthusi...enda_12-1A.doc demands unspecified "ground rules" and a session on "providing effective input" ...while my e-mails questioning just that (and why there is no simple "Q and A" period included) go unanswered to both our NOHVCC national president and my local representatives?
Appparently, the United Four Wheel Drive Association feels strongly enough about multi-use issues
needing to be discussed here that they've filed this: (from the UFWDA website)
http://www.ufwda.org/pdfs/APPEAL_HMNF_legalappeal.pdf ....yet similiar utv-related 50" vs 60" issues (top of page 7) are not something "the powers that be" want shoved in their face by mere peons off the street!.(not to mention how $4 million in November-released dollars should be spent in conjuncture with these plans or how the inevitable sticker-hike not being reported back on by our leaders
hugely affects same in the long term).
Yep, it's me
....has anybody else ever questioned where our money actually goes when it comes to all these orv groups working
together instead of apart? (sorry, but when any group claims to me that they're all about "shared trails"....that had better be the case whether their AMA buddy is arrogantly standing right there next to them...or not
).